The Best of All Possible Worlds? - A Rejoinder to Justice Liu

6 Pages Posted: 19 Apr 2014 Last revised: 4 Jun 2014

Daniel J. Bussel

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: April 17, 2014

Abstract

This Rejoinder defends the thesis of Opinions First -- Argument Afterwards by addressing criticisms raised by Justice Goodwin Liu in his forthcoming article How the California Supreme Court Actually Works: A Reply to Professor Bussel, 61 UCLA Law Review (2014).

Keywords: California Supreme Court, judicial opinions, judicial procedure, constitutional law, appellate process

Suggested Citation

Bussel, Daniel J., The Best of All Possible Worlds? - A Rejoinder to Justice Liu (April 17, 2014). 61 UCLA Law Review 1270 (2014); UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 14-03. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2426394

Daniel J. Bussel (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-7977 (Phone)
310-825-6023 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
104
Rank
212,736
Abstract Views
858