Financial Statement and Auditing Errors Associated with the Lawsuits Against Public Accountants in Australia and Singapore

35 Pages Posted: 21 Apr 2014

See all articles by Pelma Jacinth Rajapakse

Pelma Jacinth Rajapakse

Griffith University - Griffith Business School

Jodi S. Gardner

Griffith University

Date Written: December 18, 2013

Abstract

This paper considers the legal liability regime for financial advisors, namely certified public accountants and auditors, in Singapore and Australia. Examination of the comparative aspects in which lawsuits against financial advisors are commenced provided an analysis of the legal and commercial environment and the regulatory regimes of the two jurisdictions considered. Information was collected from a wide range of sources including articles, texts, government reports and professional body publications. The main basis of the paper however, was a detailed analysis of a number of court cases in Singapore and Australia. A qualitative, legal case-study method was used to meet the following objectives: (i) description of background information for the lawsuit, (ii) explanation of information collected, and (iii) analysis of the information in the context of the research topic. After a wide search on a number of different legal databases in Australia and Singapore, eleven and eight relevant cases were chosen from each jurisdiction respectively.

The case analysis was conducted to develop an understanding of the complex reasons that initiated the litigation process against the professional accountant or auditor where many variables are not quantifiable and actual causes for legal action significantly vary from one case to the other. These cases were evaluated to consider a range of issues including the court jurisdiction, main issues contributing to the litigation, types of alleged errors and findings of liability. Consequently it appeared that even though the two countries have similar regulatory regimes for financial advisors, there were a surprising range of differences in the legal and commercial environment in which claims were brought by parties. These differences highlighted the positive and negative aspects of the varying approaches and allowed the paper to make a range of recommendations for Australia, Singapore and the accounting profession at large. These recommendations include a strict approach to legal liability for advisors, enacting measures to limit the liability of advisors and the requirement and importance of good corporate governance approaches.

Keywords: Financial Reporting Errors, Fraud Detection, Negligent Misstatement, Negligent audit, Corporate Governance, Proportionate Liability, Public Accountants, Auditors, Australia, Singapore.

JEL Classification: M4, M49, Z00

Suggested Citation

Rajapakse, Pelma Jacinth and Gardner, Jodi S., Financial Statement and Auditing Errors Associated with the Lawsuits Against Public Accountants in Australia and Singapore (December 18, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2426453 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2426453

Pelma Jacinth Rajapakse (Contact Author)

Griffith University - Griffith Business School ( email )

Brisbane, Queensland 4111
Australia

Jodi S. Gardner

Griffith University ( email )

170 Kessels Road
Nathan, Queensland QLD 4111
Australia

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
17
Abstract Views
670
PlumX Metrics