Capital Budgeting and Compensation with Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard
37 Pages Posted: 1 Oct 2000
Date Written: July 17, 2000
Abstract
We consider optimal capital allocation and managerial compensation mechanisms for decentralized firms when division managers have an incentive to misrepresent project quality and to minimize privately costly but value-enhancing effort. We show that in the optimal mechanism firms always under invest in capital relative to a naive application of the net present value (NPV) rule. We make a number of novel cross-sectional predictions about the severity of the under investment problem and the composition of managerial compensation contracts. We also find that firms will optimally give greater performance-based pay (at the expense of fixed wages) to managers of higher quality projects to mitigate the incentive for managers to overstate project quality. Thus, managers may receive greater performance-based pay because they manage higher-quality projects, not that greater performance-based pay causes firm value to increase.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Balanced Budget Rules and Public Deficits: Evidence from the U.S. States
By Henning Bohn and Robert P. Inman
-
Capital Budgeting and Delegation
By Milton Harris and Artur Raviv
-
Budget Referendums and Government Spending: Evidence from Swiss Cantons
By Lars P. Feld and John G. Matsusaka
-
Decision Processes, Agency Problems, and Information: An Economic Analysis of Budget Procedures
-
Decision Processes, Agency Problems, and Information: An Economic Analysis of Budget Procedures
-
Economic Incentives and Political Institutions: Spending and Voting in School Budget Agenda
By Thomas Romer, Howard Rosenthal, ...
-
Allocation of Decision-Making Authority
By Milton Harris and Artur Raviv
-
Why the NPV Criterion Does Not Maximize NPV
By Elazar Berkovitch and Ronen Israel
-
By Ricardo Alonso and Niko Matouschek