‘American Exceptionalism’ in Goals for Civil Litigation

Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems 123 (Alan Uzelac, ed., Springer 2014)

UC Hastings Research Paper No. 99

20 Pages Posted: 24 Apr 2014

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

American procedure has long been exceptional, a fact that baffles Americans and non-Americans alike. But focusing on the goals of civil litigation provides an important insight into why U.S. procedure is so different. Everyone around the world wants procedure that suitably balances accuracy with economy. But American procedure seeks to enable litigants in this country to go further, by enforcing public norms through private initiative, a major reason why it puts fewer obstacles in the way of prospective plaintiffs. That seems to be a uniquely American role for civil litigation, and largely explains the relaxed pleading, broad discovery, and jury trial features of American civil litigation.

Suggested Citation

Marcus, Richard, ‘American Exceptionalism’ in Goals for Civil Litigation (2014). Goals of Civil Justice and Civil Procedure in Contemporary Judicial Systems 123 (Alan Uzelac, ed., Springer 2014), UC Hastings Research Paper No. 99, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2427945

Richard Marcus (Contact Author)

UC Hastings Law ( email )

200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
415-565-4829 (Phone)
415-565-4865 (Fax)

Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?

Paper statistics

Downloads
121
Abstract Views
1,003
rank
311,420
PlumX Metrics