Trade Agreements and Regulatory Autonomy: The Effect on National Interests

Susy Frankel, (ed.) LEARNING FROM THE PAST, ADAPTING FOR THE FUTURE: REGULATORY REFORM IN NEW ZEALAND (LexisNexis 2011)

Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 14/2017

35 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2014 Last revised: 1 Mar 2017

See all articles by Meredith Kolsky Lewis

Meredith Kolsky Lewis

University at Buffalo Law School; Victoria University of Wellington Law School

Susy Frankel

Victoria University of Wellington

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

International economic law agreements – including the World Trade Organization (WTO); free trade agreements (FTAs); and bilateral investment treaties (BITs) – can impact regulatory freedom in a number of important ways. Such agreements may include provisions that either mandate or encourage regulatory reform. Reforms may be called for in order to effectuate harmonisation; to facilitate cross-border trade and investment through regulatory cooperation; or merely to comply with newly established international, plurilateral, or bilateral standards. New Zealand’s participation in an array of trading arrangements, therefore, has significant implications for the country’s regulatory autonomy and ability to effect policy decisions. Trade agreements can impact New Zealand’s regulatory options both directly – through provisions in agreements to which New Zealand is a party, and indirectly – as a result of agreements with or between some of New Zealand’s trading partners to which New Zealand is not a party. This indirect impact should not be underestimated. This chapter has three objectives: first, to identify the agreements that may impact upon New Zealand’s regulatory autonomy, both directly and indirectly (Parts II and III of this paper); second, to use the context of consumer interests to provide specific examples of the ways in which trade agreement commitments affect policymaking options (Part IV); and third to discuss empirical and further research that will be conducted in the next project phase with the aim of measuring the effects trade agreements have on New Zealand’s regulatory autonomy in the consumer interests area (Part V). Within the broad category of consumer interests, this project will focus on regulatory regimes that affect food safety/biosecurity; the safety and purchasing of pharmaceuticals and product safety and performance standards.

Keywords: WTO, World Trade Organization, free trade agreements, FTAs, bilateral investment treaties, BITs, regulatory autonomy, international trade, New Zealand

JEL Classification: F02, F10, F14, F15

Suggested Citation

Lewis, Meredith Kolsky and Frankel, Susy R., Trade Agreements and Regulatory Autonomy: The Effect on National Interests (2011). Susy Frankel, (ed.) LEARNING FROM THE PAST, ADAPTING FOR THE FUTURE: REGULATORY REFORM IN NEW ZEALAND (LexisNexis 2011), Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 14/2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2428258

Meredith Kolsky Lewis (Contact Author)

University at Buffalo Law School ( email )

School of Law
719 O'Brian Hall
Buffalo, NY 14260-1100
United States

Victoria University of Wellington Law School ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

Susy R. Frankel

Victoria University of Wellington ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
87
Abstract Views
830
rank
325,652
PlumX Metrics