Quality Control: A Reply to Professor Sunstein

10 Pages Posted: 26 Apr 2014

Date Written: April 24, 2014


Unless cost-benefit analysis finds room for the nonquantifiable and nonmonetizable benefits of regulation, it will skew systematically against government action to address social problems that have significant nonquantifiable and nonmonetizable dimensions. In "Nonquantifiable" – presented as the 2013 Jorde Lecture at Berkeley Law School – Professor Cass Sunstein looks for a way out of this quandary. But the solutions he embraces – breakeven analysis, a meaningful recognition of qualitative consequences like human dignity, and a redoubled effort to quantify and monetize regulatory benefits – fall short. Breakeven analysis is too selectively deployed to be the neutral tool Sunstein seeks. Fitting qualitative values, like dignity, into the cost-benefit mold can be both legally gratuitous and conceptually confused. Monetizing heretofore nonmonetized regulatory benefits – like preventing prison rape – entails a complete redefinition of the problem at hand. We do not solve the problem of nonquantifiability by, essentially, changing the subject.

Suggested Citation

Heinzerling, Lisa, Quality Control: A Reply to Professor Sunstein (April 24, 2014). California Law Review, 2014, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2429037

Lisa Heinzerling (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics