Appointment of Arbitrators by the Designate Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act: A Critique

Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XLIX, No. 18, May 2014

Posted: 27 Apr 2014

Date Written: April 3, 2014

Abstract

Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides for appointment of arbitrators by the Chief Justice on failure of party-agreed procedure or the lack of consensus between the parties regarding the arbitrator. Numerous applications are filed every year in the Supreme Court and the high courts for appointment of arbitrators. This paper argues that (1) the judiciary has virtually created a monopoly by institutionalising appointment of retired judges as arbitrators; (2) courts have eliminated competition from other potentially capable professionals for appointment as arbitrators; and (3) there is lack of transparency in the process of appointment of arbitrators. Information to gauge the level of transparency in the appointment process has been obtained from 10 high courts and the Supreme Court through the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Keywords: arbitration, India, Chief Justice, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, appointment of arbitrator, arbitral tribunal, SBP & Co v. Patel Engineering, Right to Information Act 2005, RTI

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K33, K39, K41

Suggested Citation

Srinivasan, Badrinath, Appointment of Arbitrators by the Designate Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act: A Critique (April 3, 2014). Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XLIX, No. 18, May 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2429622

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
762
PlumX Metrics