Testing Local Average Treatment Effect Assumptions
22 Pages Posted: 27 Apr 2014 Last revised: 11 Dec 2015
Date Written: November 19, 2015
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss the key conditions for the identification and estimation of the local average treatment effect (LATE, Imbens and Angrist, 1994): the valid instrument assumption (LI) and the monotonicity assumption (LM). We show that the joint assumptions of LI and LM have a testable implication that can be summarized by a sign restriction defined by a set of intersection bounds. We propose an easy-to-implement testing procedure that can be analyzed in the framework of Chernozhukov, Lee, and Rosen (2013) and implemented using the Stata package of Chernozhukov,Kim, Lee, and Rosen (2013). We apply the proposed tests to the “draft eligibility” instrument in Angrist (1991), the “college proximity” instrument in Card (1993) and the “same sex” instrument in Angrist and Evans (1998).
Keywords: LATE, hypothesis testing, intersection bounds, conditionally more compliers
JEL Classification: C12, C15, C21
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Inference in Incomplete Models
By Alfred Galichon and Marc Henry
-
Asymptotic Properties for a Class of Partially Identified Models
-
Inference for Parameters Defined by Moment Inequalities Using Generalized Moment Selection
-
Applications of Subsampling, Hybrid, and Size-Correction Methods
-
Set Identification in Models with Multiple Equilibria
By Alfred Galichon and Marc Henry
-
The Limit of Finite-Sample Size and a Problem With Subsampling
-
Bayesian and Frequentist Inference in Partially Identified Models
-
A Test of Non-Identifying Restrictions and Confidence Regions for Partially Identified Parameters
By Alfred Galichon and Marc Henry