Distributional Consequences of Public Policies: An Example from the Management of Urban Vehicular Travel
Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 14-04
64 Pages Posted: 3 May 2014 Last revised: 2 Oct 2014
Date Written: March 13, 2014
This paper uses a spatially disaggregated computable general equilibrium model of a large US metropolitan area to compare two kinds of policies, “Live Near Your Work” and taxation of vehicular travel, that have been proposed to help further the aims of “smart growth.” Ordinarily, policy comparisons of this sort focus on the net benefits of the two policies; that is, the total monetized net welfare gains or losses to all citizens. While the aggregate net benefits are certainly important, in this analysis we also disaggregate these benefits along two important dimensions: income and location within the metropolitan area. The resulting identification of gainers and losers with these policies, though undoubtedly important to matters such as fairness and political feasibility, are rarely made. We find that these distributional effects are quite sensitive to the details of policy design.
Keywords: growth management, urban planning, urban transportation, smart growth
JEL Classification: R13, R48, R52
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation