A Comparative Study of Risk Measures for Guaranteed Minimum Maturity Benefit s by a PDE Method

North American Actuarial Journal, Vol. 18, issue 4, 2014

22 Pages Posted: 5 May 2014 Last revised: 7 Jun 2014

See all articles by Runhuan Feng

Runhuan Feng

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Date Written: May 4, 2014

Abstract

The stochastic modeling and determination of reserves and risk capitals for variable annuity guarantee products are relatively new developments in the insurance industry. The current market practice is largely based on Monte Carlo simulations, which have great engineering flexibility but the demand for heavy computational power can be prohibitive in many cases. In this paper, we distinguish and compare two types of risk models to determine the commonly used risk measures for reserving and capital calculations. Using an example of the guaranteed minimum maturity benefit, we investigate alternative numerical methods that require less computational resources and yet achieves high accuracy and efficiency.

Keywords: Variable annuity guaranteed benefit, actuarial risk management, numerical PDE method, quantile risk measure, conditional tail expectation.

JEL Classification: C63; G22; G17

Suggested Citation

Feng, Runhuan, A Comparative Study of Risk Measures for Guaranteed Minimum Maturity Benefit s by a PDE Method (May 4, 2014). North American Actuarial Journal, Vol. 18, issue 4, 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2432640

Runhuan Feng (Contact Author)

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ( email )

601 E John St
Champaign, IL Champaign 61820
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
550
Rank
670,101
PlumX Metrics