A Comparative Study of Risk Measures for Guaranteed Minimum Maturity Benefits by a PDE Method
North American Actuarial Journal, Vol. 18, issue 4, 2014
22 Pages Posted: 5 May 2014 Last revised: 7 Jun 2014
Date Written: May 4, 2014
Abstract
The stochastic modeling and determination of reserves and risk capitals for variable annuity guarantee products are relatively new developments in the insurance industry. The current market practice is largely based on Monte Carlo simulations, which have great engineering flexibility but the demand for heavy computational power can be prohibitive in many cases. In this paper, we distinguish and compare two types of risk models to determine the commonly used risk measures for reserving and capital calculations. Using an example of the guaranteed minimum maturity benefit, we investigate alternative numerical methods that require less computational resources and yet achieves high accuracy and efficiency.
Keywords: Variable annuity guaranteed benefit, actuarial risk management, numerical PDE method, quantile risk measure, conditional tail expectation.
JEL Classification: C63; G22; G17
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation