Public Authority Immunity from Negligence Liability: Uncertain, Unnecessary, and Unjustified

(2014) 92:2 Canadian Bar Review (Forthcoming).

Ottawa Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 2014-11

33 Pages Posted: 7 May 2014 Last revised: 30 Sep 2015

See all articles by Bruce Feldthusen

Bruce Feldthusen

University of Ottawa - Common Law Section

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 16, 2014

Abstract

During the period between the Supreme Court of Canada’s 1989 decision in Just v British Columbia and its 2001 decision in Cooper v Hobart the dominant issue in public authority negligence law was “common law immunity” for policy decisions. After 2001, proximity replaced immunity as the key concept in public authority negligence law. Immunity is most important when it is invoked to dismiss the action in the rare case in which the court had previously found a prima facie duty of care based on sufficient proximity between the parties. This is what happened at trial in Just v British Columbia and also in the 2011 Supreme Court of Canada decision in R v Imperial Tobacco Canada. Using these cases as the models, the author demonstrates that the policy-operational continuum used to determine the scope of immunity is uncertain to the point of meaningless. Next, the author suggests that a proper definition of proximity renders the immunity concept superfluous. Finally the author argues that when proximity is established on the same basis as it would be established in a private party action, it is wrong to immunize the public authority from negligence liability. The historical foundations of immunity are exposed as suspect. The accepted rationales for immunity do not apply to basic negligence issues that lie at the heart of the courts’ institutional competence. In Imperial Tobacco the government’s unnecessary negligence exposed smokers to an increased risk of illness and death. There was no justification for immunity.

Keywords: torts, negligence, immunity, government, public authority, policy operational, proximity

JEL Classification: H19, I18, K13

Suggested Citation

Feldthusen, Bruce, Public Authority Immunity from Negligence Liability: Uncertain, Unnecessary, and Unjustified (June 16, 2014). (2014) 92:2 Canadian Bar Review (Forthcoming)., Ottawa Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 2014-11, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2433058 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2433058

Bruce Feldthusen (Contact Author)

University of Ottawa - Common Law Section ( email )

57 Louis Pasteur Street
Ottawa, K1N 6N5
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
323
Abstract Views
1,177
rank
79,253
PlumX Metrics