Strict Liability in the Shadow of Juries

20 Pages Posted: 6 May 2014

See all articles by Darryl K. Brown

Darryl K. Brown

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: September 2014

Abstract

American and English criminal law is characterized by wider use of strict liability than one finds in the criminal law of many European jurisdictions. With respect to English law, scholars have suggested that the use of lay juries explains the prevalence of strict liability offenses. This paper investigates that idea in American law and finds some evidence for it. Courts and legislatures sometimes worry that mens rea is difficult to prove when the only available evidence is circumstantial — it must be inferred from conduct and circumstances. Just as the evidence rules reflect a concern with the limits of jurors’ abilities to handle certain kinds of evidence, the regarding strict liability as well as reverse burdens of proof (under which defendants must prove defenses) manifests a concern that juries worse than judges at inferring culpability from available evidence. One way to address this deficiency is to eliminate the requirement for mens rea altogether.

But then what safeguards remain to ensure that only the culpable are criminally punished? The answer in American law, broadly, is that adversarial criminal procedure is thought to compensate for this deficiency in substantive criminal law. Courts identify, somewhat obliquely, two procedural components in particular: the use of prosecutorial discretion, and — paradoxically — the jury. While courts are somewhat skeptical of the jury’s capacity to accurately recognize proof of culpability, they profess faith in the lay jury’s “common sense” instincts — or political judgments — to prevent convictions of the non-culpable. On that view, strict liability addresses the jury’s weakness regarding a challenging issue of proof, while the jury’s purportedly strong capacity for normative judgment, in turn, provides a safeguard against unjustified punishment.

Keywords: criminal law, mens rea, strict liability, juries

Suggested Citation

Brown, Darryl K., Strict Liability in the Shadow of Juries (September 2014). Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 67, 2014, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2014-33, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2433243 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2433243

Darryl K. Brown (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
86
Abstract Views
635
rank
345,889
PlumX Metrics