Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning
PROPORTIONALITY AND THE RULE OF LAW: RIGHTS, JUSTIFICATION, REASONING, Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller, and Grégoire Webber, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2014
27 Pages Posted: 9 May 2014
There are 2 versions of this paper
Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning Introduction
Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning
Date Written: April 21, 2014
Abstract
Proportionality has been received into the constitutional doctrine of courts in Continental Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, Israel, South Africa, and the United States, as well as the jurisprudence of treaty-based legal systems such as the European Convention on Human Rights.
Proportionality provides a common analytical framework for resolving the great moral and political questions confronting political communities. But behind the singular appeal to proportionality lurks a range of different understandings. This volume brings together many of the world's leading constitutional theorists – proponents and critics of proportionality – to debate the merits of proportionality, the nature of rights, the practice of judicial review, and moral and legal reasoning. Their essays provide important new perspectives on this leading doctrine in human rights law.
This is the Introduction to Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning, published by Cambridge University Press in April, 2014. In addition to the Introduction, this paper includes a list of contributors and a table of contents.
Keywords: Constitutional theory, judicial review, proportionality, comparative constitutional law, constitutional rights, interpretation, rule of law,
JEL Classification: K10, K19, K30, K39
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation