Gossiping About Judges

47 Pages Posted: 15 May 2014

Date Written: May 13, 2014

Abstract

Gossip about judges is an essential source of information to civil litigators. Hearing third-party assessments of a judge’s personality, demeanor, intelligence, curiosity, and openness to new interpretations of the law can substantially affect a lawyer’s strategic decisions during the course of litigation, and sometimes whether litigation occurs at all. Yet gossip about judges rarely merits mention, and has evaded serious study.

This Article brings attorney gossip about judges out into the open, identifying its strategic benefits and drawbacks, and explaining how attorneys use gossip (and other secondhand information on judges) to anticipate the likely outcome of judicial decisions. It further explains how common attorney practices in modern civil litigation unintentionally compromise the accuracy and reliability of gossip about judges, and offers some thoughts on restoring the full value of this little-discussed resource.

Keywords: Gossip, Reputation, War Stories, Social Cognition, Impression Formation, Judges, Attorney-Judge Interaction, Signaling, Shared Reality, Experience Sampling, Forum Shopping, Pretrial Process, Federal District Courts

JEL Classification: K40, K41

Suggested Citation

Singer, Jordan M., Gossiping About Judges (May 13, 2014). Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 42, Forthcoming; New England Law | Boston Research Paper No. 14-07. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2436581

Jordan M. Singer (Contact Author)

New England Law | Boston ( email )

154 Stuart St.
Boston, MA 02116
United States
(617) 368-1434 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.nesl.edu

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
100
Abstract Views
969
rank
271,301
PlumX Metrics