Loanable Funds vs. Endogenous Money: Krugman is Wrong, Keen is Right

Egmont Kakarot-Handtke, “Loanable funds vs. endogenous money: Krugman is wrong, Keen is right”, real-world economics review, issue no. 67, 09 May 2014, pp. 2-16

15 Pages Posted: 17 May 2014

See all articles by Egmont Kakarot-Handtke

Egmont Kakarot-Handtke

University of Stuttgart - Institute of Economics and Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: May 16, 2014

Abstract

In his recent article, Keen resumes the debate with Krugman about the effects of debt upon the economy. It is hard to see how the question can be settled as long as all participants apply their idiosyncratic models. Hence the issue boils down, as Krugman rightly put it, to the deeper question: "how should one do economics." Sketched with a broad brush, the consensus is that Orthodoxy has failed and that Heterodoxy has no convincing alternative to offer. The conceptual consequence of the present paper is to restart from a firm common formal ground. This relocation makes the debate solvable.

Keywords: new framework of concepts, structure-centric, axiom set, consumption economy, debt, Profit Law, simulation, market clearing, budget balancing

JEL Classification: B59, E21, G00

Suggested Citation

Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, Loanable Funds vs. Endogenous Money: Krugman is Wrong, Keen is Right (May 16, 2014). Egmont Kakarot-Handtke, “Loanable funds vs. endogenous money: Krugman is wrong, Keen is right”, real-world economics review, issue no. 67, 09 May 2014, pp. 2-16. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2437834

Egmont Kakarot-Handtke (Contact Author)

University of Stuttgart - Institute of Economics and Law ( email )

Keplerstrasse 17
Stuttgart
Germany

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
73
Abstract Views
590
rank
147,362
PlumX Metrics