The Geography of Mercy: An Empirical Analysis of Clemency for Death Row Inmates

39 Thurgood Marshall Law Review 3 (2013)

26 Pages Posted: 18 May 2014 Last revised: 23 May 2014

Matthew C. Heise

Independent

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

Conventional wisdom notes persistent regional differences in the application of the death penalty, with southern states’ appetite for capital punishment exceeding that of non-southern states. Scholars analyzing the distributions of death sentences and state executions find a geographic influence. Less explored, however, is a possible regional difference in the distribution of executive clemency even though clemency is an integral component of a criminal justice system that includes capital punishment. If geography influences the distribution of the death penalty, geography should also influence the distribution of clemency. Data, however, reveal some surprises. Using a recently-released data set of all state death row inmates from 1973 to 2010, this paper considers whether clemency is exercised in southern and non-southern states in systematically different ways. No statistically significant differences exist between southern and non-southern states when it came to clemency, even though southern states were more prone to execute and less prone to disturb death sentences through reversal on appeal than northern states. When it comes to the influence of geography in the death penalty context, the findings provide mixed support and convey a complicated picture.

Keywords: Clemency, Death Penalty, Empirical

Suggested Citation

Heise, Matthew C., The Geography of Mercy: An Empirical Analysis of Clemency for Death Row Inmates (2013). 39 Thurgood Marshall Law Review 3 (2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2438021

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
49
Abstract Views
365
PlumX