26 Pages Posted: 2 Jun 2014
Date Written: February 1, 2013
This paper studies how dual-self (Fudenberg and Levine (2006)) decision-makers can use commitment technologies to combat temptation and implement long-run optimal actions. I consider three types of commitment technologies: carrot contracts (rewards for 'good' behavior financed by borrowing from future consumption), stick contracts (self imposed fines for 'bad' behavior) and binding commitment. I compare the welfare implications of these contracts and show that dual-self decision-makers strictly prefer to use carrots instead of either sticks or binding commitments. This is for several reasons: sticks are highly vulnerable to trembles (while carrots are not), sticks and bind- ing commitments create a temptation to cancel them (while carrots do not), and finally carrots allow easy tradeoffs between commitment and flexibility (while sticks and binding commitments do not).
Keywords: behavioral economics, dual self model, commitment contracts, self control
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Peysakhovich, Alexander, How to Commit (If You Must): Commitment Contracts and the Dual-Self Model (February 1, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2444434 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2444434