Biodiversity Baking and Boiling: Endangered Species Act Turning Down the Heat

32 Pages Posted: 15 Jul 2014

See all articles by Anna Moritz

Anna Moritz

Center for Biological Diversity

Kassie Siegel

Center for Biological Diversity

Brendan Cummings

Center for Biological Diversity

William H. Rodgers

University of Washington - School of Law

Date Written: Fall 2008

Abstract

Today the Earth faces an extinction event on a scale second only to Earth’s largest mass extinction, the Permian-Triassic event 250 million years ago. The driver is global warming, caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions.

In this article, we begin by providing a brief overview of biodiversity, the threats global warming poses to it, and the economic and social costs that the loss of biodiversity will exact on human society. We then review four key examples of ways in which the Endangered Species Act operates or should operate to address global warming and greenhouse gas emissions and confer substantial benefits on species threatened by the climate crisis: (1) the listing process; (2) the section 7 consultation process required of federal agencies; (3) the designation of critical habitat; and (4) the preparation and implementation of recovery plans.

The ESA has been our strongest and most successful law for the protection of plants and animals on the brink of extinction for the past four decades, and if fully implemented to address both the impact of current warming and new greenhouse gas emissions, will remain strong and relevant in the future. The ESA is one of our most important rapid response mechanisms, and may be our best hope for preserving the rich biodiversity that we take for granted every day.

Keywords: biodiversity, endangered species act, habitat, ecosystems, administrative law, recovery plans, climate change, global warming

Suggested Citation

Moritz, Anna and Siegel, Kassie and Cummings, Brendan and Rodgers, William H., Biodiversity Baking and Boiling: Endangered Species Act Turning Down the Heat (Fall 2008). Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 205-31, 2008, University of Washington School of Law Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2446201

Anna Moritz

Center for Biological Diversity ( email )

P.O. Box 710
Tucson, AZ 85702-0710
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/

Kassie Siegel

Center for Biological Diversity ( email )

P.O. Box 710
Tucson, AZ 85702-0710
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/

Brendan Cummings

Center for Biological Diversity ( email )

P.O. Box 710
Tucson, AZ 85702-0710
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/

William H. Rodgers (Contact Author)

University of Washington - School of Law ( email )

4293 Memorial Way
353020
Seattle, WA 98195-3020
United States

HOME PAGE: https://www.law.washington.edu/directory/profile.aspx?ID=154

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
592
PlumX Metrics