Rules, Standards, and the Reality of Obviousness

37 Pages Posted: 8 Jun 2014 Last revised: 23 Aug 2016

See all articles by Brenda M. Simon

Brenda M. Simon

California Western School of Law; University of California, San Diego (UCSD)

Date Written: June 11, 2014

Abstract

The great question of patent law, obviousness, is a muddle. Attempts to clarify the doctrine face a significant obstacle: the goal of providing efficient and cost-effective prosecution limits the amount of time patent examiners can spend determining obviousness. As a result, examiners use the analogous arts test as a rough gauge of obviousness during prosecution. The hope was that the analogous arts test would provide an efficient, rules-based approach to obviousness. The Federal Circuit has not, however, provided much guidance on how to apply the analogous arts test, resulting in a soft rule, at best.

While this uncertainty may be tolerable during prosecution, where time-pressed examiners can be forgiven for relying on common sense among other things, courts should no longer rely on the outdated analogous arts test as a shortcut to find inventions obvious. During litigation, more time and resources can be spent on the obviousness assessment. At that time, decision-makers should use a more appropriate standard, requiring assessment of common practices in the field of invention and whether the invention is obvious in light of them. This shift in the focus of the obviousness analysis during litigation should result in a more accurate determination of obviousness when it matters most.

Keywords: patent, obvious, obviousness, nonobvious, invention, technology, analogous art

JEL Classification: K19, K29, K39, O3, O31, O32, O34

Suggested Citation

Simon, Brenda M., Rules, Standards, and the Reality of Obviousness (June 11, 2014). Case Western Law Review, Vol. 65, p. 25, 2014, Thomas Jefferson School of Law Research Paper No. 2447141, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2447141

Brenda M. Simon (Contact Author)

California Western School of Law ( email )

225 Cedar Street
San Diego, CA 92101
United States

University of California, San Diego (UCSD)

9500 Gilman Drive
Mail Code 0502
La Jolla, CA 92093-0112
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
137
Abstract Views
914
rank
236,724
PlumX Metrics