Screening Out Unwanted Calls: The Hypocrisy of Standing 'Doctrine'

22 Pages Posted: 11 Jun 2014 Last revised: 12 Feb 2016

Date Written: June 9, 2014

Abstract

This article explores one dimension of the "closed courthouse door" approach of recent Supreme Court decisions, particularly Amnesty International v. Clapper, and contrasts its restrictive standing doctrine with the open door that has been shown to "reverse discrimination" plaintiffs.

Suggested Citation

Brodin, Mark S., Screening Out Unwanted Calls: The Hypocrisy of Standing 'Doctrine' (June 9, 2014). 15 Nevada Law Journal 1181, 2015, Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 323, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2447634

Mark S. Brodin (Contact Author)

Boston College - Law School ( email )

885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Abstract Views
443
rank
459,402
PlumX Metrics