46 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2014 Last revised: 28 Jul 2015
Date Written: July 27, 2015
Field experiments rely heavily on self-reported data, but subjects may misreport behaviors, especially sensitive ones such as crime. If treatment influences survey responses, it biases experimental estimates. We develop a validation technique that uses intensive qualitative work to assess survey measurement error. Subjects were assigned to receive cash, therapy, both, or neither. According to survey responses, receiving both treatments dramatically reduced crime and other sensitive behaviors. Local researchers spent several days with a random subsample of subjects following their endline surveys, building trust and seeking verbal confirmation of six behaviors: theft, drug use, homelessness, gambling, and two expenditures. This validation suggests that subjects in the control and cash only groups underreported sensitive behaviors and expenditures in the survey relative to the other treatment arms. We bound survey-based treatment effects estimates, and find the impacts of cash and therapy on crime may be larger than suggested by surveys alone.
Keywords: survey methodology, field experiments, measurement error, crime, drug use, Liberia
JEL Classification: O1, C93, I32, C81, K4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Blattman, Christopher and Jamison, Julian C. and Koroknay-Palicz, Tricia G. and Rodrigues, Katherine and Sheridan, Margaret, Measuring the Measurement Error: A Method to Qualitatively Validate Survey Data (July 27, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2449048 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2449048