Political Obstacles to the Implementation of Emissions Markets: Lessons from Reclaim

48 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2001 Last revised: 15 May 2011

See all articles by Dale B. Thompson

Dale B. Thompson

University of St. Thomas - Department of Ethics & Business Law

Date Written: May 13, 2011

Abstract

Why have so few emissions markets been implemented? This article addresses this question by examining the political economy of the REgional CLean AIr Market (RECLAIM) for Los Angeles. RECLAIM offers an excellent opportunity to study the political obstacles of emissions markets, because its nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides component was implemented while its volatile organic compounds component was not. By carefully analyzing the decisions of the regulatory agency responsible for RECLAIM, this article offers a precise explanation of the political obstacles faced by an emissions market like RECLAIM. These obstacles include the difficulty in extending markets to sources and products that were previously unregulated under a command-and-control regime. Also, political conflict arising because of uncertainty is more contentious under emissions markets than under command-and-control regulation. This article then offers suggestions for improving the political feasibility of emissions markets.

Suggested Citation

Thompson, Dale B., Political Obstacles to the Implementation of Emissions Markets: Lessons from Reclaim (May 13, 2011). Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3, Summer 2000, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=244974

Dale B. Thompson (Contact Author)

University of St. Thomas - Department of Ethics & Business Law ( email )

Opus College of Business
MCH 316
St. Paul, MN 55105
United States
651-962-5195 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
29
Abstract Views
591
PlumX Metrics