A Balancing Act: Retaining Investor-State Dispute Settlement Provisions in Investment Agreements and Balancing Stakeholder Interests

Australian Year Book of International Law Vol. 31, 2013

42 Pages Posted: 17 Dec 2014

See all articles by Thilini Perera

Thilini Perera

Independent

Dalma Demeter

University of Canberra - School of Law

Date Written: December 19, 2013

Abstract

This paper is written in the context of the unravelling policy debate on Investor-State Dispute Settlement in Australia, which has become central in the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations. Deviating from the widely accepted international practice of resolving investment disputes through international arbitration, the former Gillard government, in its April 2011 Trade Policy Statement, decided to discontinue the practice of including such dispute settlement provisions in investment agreements with developing countries. The paper argues that excluding ISDS provisions would in fact be a misdirected solution to the government’s concerns that are, allegedly, behind the new policy and would negatively impact on the interests of key stakeholders to investment agreements, being disproportionately beneficial to the host state, to the disadvantage of both foreign and domestic investors.

In advocating for the retention of ISDS provisions, this paper demonstrates that it is possible to successfully perform the balancing act of retaining investor-state dispute settlement provisions and harmonising stakeholder interests by redrafting key treaty provisions. Adopting substantive measures address to the concerns erroneously attributed to the existence of ISDS will appropriately balance all stakeholder interests, preserving the state’s sovereign policy making powers, while also enabling the retention of investor-state dispute settlement provisions.

Keywords: investor-state arbitration, international arbitration, international trade law, investment law, ISDS, TPP

JEL Classification: F13, F14, F21, K10, K23, K33

Suggested Citation

Perera, Thilini and Demeter, Dalma, A Balancing Act: Retaining Investor-State Dispute Settlement Provisions in Investment Agreements and Balancing Stakeholder Interests (December 19, 2013). Australian Year Book of International Law Vol. 31, 2013, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2452879

Thilini Perera

Independent ( email )

Dalma Demeter (Contact Author)

University of Canberra - School of Law ( email )

Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
145
Abstract Views
876
Rank
391,807
PlumX Metrics