The Ibm and Microsoft Cases: What's the Difference?

Posted: 19 Jan 2001

See all articles by Franklin M. Fisher

Franklin M. Fisher

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics

Abstract

The Microsoft case has attracted more attention than perhaps any antitrust case in history - far more than the mammoth IBM case of the 1970's, with which it is sometimes compared. I was the chief economics witness for IBM in U.S. v. IBM and the chief economics witness for the United States in U.S. v. Microsoft.

I did not "switch sides". Even though both cases involved "bundling" and charges of "monopoly leveraging", the facts were different, and the principles of economic analysis led to different outcomes. In particular, Microsoft's actions did what IBM's could not have done -- excluded competitors by protecting an important barrier to entry into the market in which it held monopoly power.

JEL Classification: L40, K21

Suggested Citation

Fisher, Franklin M., The Ibm and Microsoft Cases: What's the Difference?. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=245619

Franklin M. Fisher (Contact Author)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics ( email )

50 Memorial Drive
E52-391
Cambridge, MA 02142
United States
617-864-3752 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://web.mit.edu/ffisher/www

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
4,003
PlumX Metrics