Justice Clarence Thomas's Korematsu Problem

Harvard Journal of Racial & Ethnic Justice, Vol. 30, p. 201, 2014

18 Pages Posted: 22 Jun 2014  

Mark Kende

Drake University Law School

Date Written: June 19, 2014

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court's infamous decision in Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944) has been in the news recently as some scholars and advocates, such as Peter Irons, have asked the Court to formally repudiate the decision. This essay breaks new ground by demonstrating that Justice Clarence Thomas’s jurisprudence on executive power is consistent with that case. Two cases provide the major evidence. First, Justice Thomas was the lone dissenter in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004) where he reasoned that enemy combatants who were U.S. citizens have virtually no due process rights.

Moreover, in Johnson v. California, 543 U.S. 499 (2005), he dissented and supported the California prison system’s practice of racially segregating inmates during the intake process. California argued this minimized racial violence. Thomas therefore abandoned his well-known position of racial color-blindness in the case. The juxtaposition of these opinions shows that he would have placed weak national security concerns ahead of strong evidence of racial bias as in Korematsu. The essay also addresses several counter-arguments. While Justice Thomas is a well-known supporter of very strong Presidential power, this essay demonstrates that his position is more extreme than might have been thought.

Keywords: constitutional law, Korematsu, Justice Clarence Thomas, Hamdi, Johnson v. California, national security, color-blindness, executive power

Suggested Citation

Kende, Mark, Justice Clarence Thomas's Korematsu Problem (June 19, 2014). Harvard Journal of Racial & Ethnic Justice, Vol. 30, p. 201, 2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2456868

Mark Kende (Contact Author)

Drake University Law School ( email )

27th & Carpenter Sts.
Des Moines, IA 50311
United States
515-271-3354 (Phone)
515-271-1958 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.drake.edu/law/clinics-centers/conlaw/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
157
rank
175,240
Abstract Views
1,036
PlumX