Liberal but Not Stupid: Meeting the Promise of Downsizing Prisons

Cullen, Francis and Petersilia, Joan. (2015). Liberal But Not Stupid: Meeting the Promise of Downsizing Prisons. Stanford Journal of Criminal Law and Policy, Vol. 2.

43 Pages Posted: 24 Jun 2014 Last revised: 17 Apr 2015

See all articles by Joan Petersilia

Joan Petersilia

Stanford University

Francis T. Cullen

University of Cincinnati

Date Written: June 23, 2014

Abstract

A confluence of factors — a perfect storm — interfered with the intractable rise of imprisonment and contributed to the emergence of a new sensibility defining continued mass imprisonment as non-sustainable. In this context, reducing America’s prisons has materialized as a viable possibility. For progressives who have long called for restraint in the use of incarceration, the challenge is whether the promise of downsizing can be met. The failure of past reforms aimed at decarceration stand as a sobering reminder that good intentions do not easily translate into good results. Further, a number of other reasons exist for why meaningful downsizing might well fail (e.g., the enormous scale of imprisonment that must be confronted, limited mechanisms available to release inmates, lack of quality alternative programs). Still, reasons also exist for optimism, the most important of which is the waning legitimacy of the paradigm of mass incarceration, which has produced efforts to lower inmate populations and close institutions in various states. The issue of downsizing will also remain at the forefront of correctional discourse because of the court-ordered reduction in imprisonment in California. This experiment is ongoing, but is revealing the difficulty of downsizing; the initiative appears to be producing mixed results (e.g., reductions in the state’s prison population but increased in local jail populations). In the end, successful downsizing must be “liberal but not stupid.” Thus, reform efforts must be guided not only by progressive values but also by a clear reliance on scientific knowledge about corrections and on a willingness to address the pragmatic issues that can thwart good intentions. Ultimately, a “criminology of downsizing” must be developed to foster effective policy interventions.

Suggested Citation

Petersilia, Joan and Cullen, Francis T., Liberal but Not Stupid: Meeting the Promise of Downsizing Prisons (June 23, 2014). Cullen, Francis and Petersilia, Joan. (2015). Liberal But Not Stupid: Meeting the Promise of Downsizing Prisons. Stanford Journal of Criminal Law and Policy, Vol. 2. . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2458024 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2458024

Joan Petersilia (Contact Author)

Stanford University ( email )

Stanford, CA 94305
United States

Francis T. Cullen

University of Cincinnati ( email )

Cincinnati, OH 45221-0389
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
611
rank
39,885
Abstract Views
2,660
PlumX