The Penn State 'Consent Decree': The NCAA's Coercive Means Don't Justify the Laudable Ends, but Is There a Legal Remedy?

29 Pages Posted: 25 Jun 2014  

Matt Mitten

Marquette University - Law School

Date Written: June 24, 2014

Abstract

In a July 23, 2012 Consent Decree, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), acting through its Executive Committee and President Mark Emmert, imposed unprecedented sanctions on Pennsylvania State University (Penn State). This action apparently was taken in an effort to convincingly demonstrate presidential control of intercollegiate athletics after recent widely reported scandals involving violations of NCAA amateurism, academic integrity, and ethical conduct rules by persons associated with high-profile intercollegiate football programs. This unprecedented use of de facto "best interests" power to punish a member university for individual criminal activity and institutional misconduct which traditionally has not been disciplined by the NCAA and which was unilaterally imposed outside of its customary rules enforcement and disciplinary procedures violated Penn State's contractual due process rights and private association law as well as possibly federal antitrust law and state common law restraint of trade laws.

Keywords: sports law, NCAA, college athletics, intercollegiate, contract law, antitrust

Suggested Citation

Mitten, Matt, The Penn State 'Consent Decree': The NCAA's Coercive Means Don't Justify the Laudable Ends, but Is There a Legal Remedy? (June 24, 2014). Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2014; Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 14-20. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2458432

Matthew J. Mitten (Contact Author)

Marquette University - Law School ( email )

Eckstein Hall
P.O. Box 1881
Milwaukee, WI 53201
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
33
Abstract Views
283