TPP versus RCEP: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting

Journal of East Asian Economic Integration Vol. 18, No. 2 (June 2014) 163-186

24 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2014 Last revised: 6 Nov 2016

Date Written: June 30, 2014

Abstract

This paper argues that the formation of regional integration frameworks can be best understood as a dominant state’s attempt to create a preferred regional framework in which it can exercise exclusive influence. In this context, it is important to observe not only which countries are included in a regional framework, but also which countries are excluded from it. For example, the distinct feature of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is its exclusion of China, and that of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is its exclusion of the United States (US). An exclusion of a particular country does not mean that the excluded country will perpetually remain outside the framework. In fact, TPP may someday include China, resulting from a policy of the US “engaging” or “socializing” China rather than “balancing” against it. However, the first step of such a policy is to establish a regional framework from which the target country of engagement is excluded.

Keywords: Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), Membership, Exclusion, Agenda Setting

JEL Classification: F13, F15, F53

Suggested Citation

Hamanaka, Shintaro, TPP versus RCEP: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting (June 30, 2014). Journal of East Asian Economic Integration Vol. 18, No. 2 (June 2014) 163-186, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2460616

Shintaro Hamanaka (Contact Author)

Asian Development Bank ( email )

6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550
Metro Manila
Philippines

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,257
Abstract Views
4,653
Rank
30,523
PlumX Metrics