58 Pages Posted: 2 Jul 2014 Last revised: 28 Aug 2014
Date Written: June 29, 2014
In recent years, several judges on the nation’s most important regulatory court -- the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit -- have given birth to libertarian administrative law, in the form of a series of judge-made doctrines that are designed to protect private ordering from national regulatory intrusion. These doctrines involve nondelegation principles, protection of commercial speech, procedures governing interpretive rules, arbitrariness review, standing, and reviewability. Libertarian administrative law can be seen as a second-best option for those who believe, as some of the relevant judges openly argue, that the New Deal and the modern regulatory state suffer from basic constitutional infirmities. Taken as a whole, libertarian administrative law parallels the kind of progressive administrative law that the same court created in the 1970s, and that the Supreme Court unanimously rejected in the Vermont Yankee case. It should meet a similar fate. Two cases to be decided next Term provide an opportunity for the Court to repudiate libertarian administrative law.
Keywords: libertarianism, commercial speech, cost-benefit analysis, nondelegation, rulemaking, standing
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Sunstein, Cass R. and Vermeule, Adrian, Libertarian Administrative Law (June 29, 2014). University of Chicago Law Review, Forthcoming; Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 14-29. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2460822