Human Rights vs Property Rights

Just World Institute Working Paper No. 2013/04

26 Pages Posted: 2 Jul 2014

See all articles by Tim Hayward

Tim Hayward

University of Edinburgh - School of Social and Political Science

Date Written: October 11, 2013

Abstract

It is possible to claim that human rights trump mere rights of property. But first the two categories must be clearly distinguished. Progress on this requires some methodological innovation. The approach adopted does not start from definitions of two concepts and then seek to contrast them; rather, it proceeds by noting a series of distinctions that together differentiate two mutually disjunctive categories of rights. Recognizing that sometimes human rights fulfillment may instrumentally require specific property rights, and that a capacity for ownership can sometimes be defended on a human rights basis, I argue, nevertheless, against justifications for claiming that among human rights is a general and substantive right of property. The conceptual distinction presented here enables us to delimit the scope of justification for property rights so that for any specific property right in any definite context we can determine whether or not it has a human rights justification.

Keywords: human rights, property rights, rights, Waldron

Suggested Citation

Hayward, Tim, Human Rights vs Property Rights (October 11, 2013). Just World Institute Working Paper No. 2013/04, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2461207 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2461207

Tim Hayward (Contact Author)

University of Edinburgh - School of Social and Political Science ( email )

Edinburgh, EH8 9LL
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
191
Abstract Views
1,458
Rank
304,833
PlumX Metrics