Cultural Differences in Everyday Causal Reasoning: Evidence that Westerners are Logical Isolaters whereas Easterners are Analogical Modelers

73 Pages Posted: 8 Jul 2014

Date Written: July 8, 2014

Abstract

This paper begins by outlining the different values highlighted by Western and Eastern philosophies and how these values are reflected in cultural differences in psychology generally. Next it argues that these cultural differences in philosophy and cognition are reflected in reasoning about causation in particular. Specifically, Westerners rely heavily on counterfactual reasoning whereas Easterners may not. Finally, it proposes that instead of relying on counterfactual reasoning, Easterners are particularly likely to rely on analogical reasoning. To support this proposition, the paper provides preliminary empirical evidence suggesting that Easterners are more adept at analogical reasoning than Westerners.

Keywords: Culture, causation, counterfactuals, analogical reasoning, philosophy of science

Suggested Citation

Gilbert, Elizabeth, Cultural Differences in Everyday Causal Reasoning: Evidence that Westerners are Logical Isolaters whereas Easterners are Analogical Modelers (July 8, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2463524 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2463524

Elizabeth Gilbert (Contact Author)

University of Virginia ( email )

1400 University Ave
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
261
Abstract Views
1,520
Rank
248,932
PlumX Metrics