Cultural Differences in Counterfactual Thinking and the Hindsight Bias

110 Pages Posted: 8 Jul 2014

Date Written: December 2012

Abstract

Three experiments compared the impact of counterfactual thinking (imagining alternatives to reality) on the hindsight bias (the pervasive tendency for people to believe that an outcome was more predictable in retrospect than it actually was a priori) for Chinese versus American participants. Contrary to previous findings, Chinese participants did not always exhibit a greater hindsight bias than their Western counterparts after event outcomes — indeed sometimes Americans exhibited a greater bias. Moreover, contrary to previous theory suggesting that cultural differences in hindsight bias stem from cultural differences in analytic versus holistic thinking style, the hindsight bias was not accounted for by an individual measure of holistic versus analytic thinking. Instead, our findings suggest that (1) how counterfactual thinking affects the hindsight bias depends on the type of counterfactuals participants generated, and (2) cultural differences in the hindsight bias may stem from East Asians judging different counterfactuals to be different in type, and in particular to be more or less effective and controllable.

Keywords: cultural differences, counterfactual thinking, hindsight bias, causal reasoning, potency, control

Suggested Citation

Gilbert, Elizabeth, Cultural Differences in Counterfactual Thinking and the Hindsight Bias (December 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2463528 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2463528

Elizabeth Gilbert (Contact Author)

University of Virginia ( email )

1400 University Ave
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
267
Abstract Views
1,899
Rank
243,285
PlumX Metrics