Retaliation's Changing Landscape

Posted: 16 Jul 2014

Date Written: July 8, 2014

Abstract

Over the past forty years, the Supreme Court has been asked to determine the meaning of ambiguous terms in numerous civil rights statutes. In some cases, the Court has taken a narrow, conservative view of such terms and, despite the absurd result, has justified its outcome by relying on the separation of powers doctrine and on Congress's ability to effectuate a different interpretation. The Court often has reached such a confined result by limiting its analysis to determining the plain meaning of the statutory text and by refusing to consider other valuable resources such as legislative history, purpose, and policy.

Yet in other instances, the Court has taken a broad, expansive approach to interpreting ambiguous statutory terms, justifying such judicial activism by examining the spirit and purpose of the underlying law and the justice achieved in reaching the result. This approach to statutory interpretation has been particularly controversial when the Court reaches a result that Congress clearly did not consider at the time the statute was enacted. Such rulings raise a more theoretical issue regarding the proper role of the Court; precisely, whether it should serve as a "superlegislature," incorporating public values into decisions involving statutory interpretation.

In just the last three years, the Supreme Court again has defined the scope of ambiguous statutory terms in three civil rights statutes. The Court's analysis has centered on whether statutory prohibitions of "discrimination" encompass claims of retaliation ...

Suggested Citation

Zehrt, Lynn, Retaliation's Changing Landscape (July 8, 2014). George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal (CRLJ), Vol. 20, No. 143, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2463821

Lynn Zehrt (Contact Author)

Belmont University - College of Law ( email )

1900 Belmont Boulevard
Nashville, TN 37212
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
211
PlumX Metrics