Trade Secrets and Mutual Investments
61 Pages Posted: 23 Oct 2000
Date Written: October 2000
Abstract
This paper employs an optimal contracting framework to study the question of how courts should adjudicate disputes over valuable trade secrets (such as customer lists). We focus principally on contexts where trade secrets are formed endogenously, through specific, non-contractible investments that could potentially come from either employers or employees (or both). Within such contexts, we argue, an "optimal" trade secret law diverges in many important respects from existing doctrine. In particular, an optimal doctrine would (1) expressly consider the parties' relative skills at making value enhancing investments rather than the mere existence of a valuable informational asset; (2) tend to favor "weak" entitlements (such as fractional property rights and/or liability rules) rather than undivided property rules; and (3) frequently have a dynamic structure that progressively favors employees during the lifetime of the disputed asset. Moreover, we argue, the considerations implicit in such a doctrine are relatively simple and need not impose prohibitive administrative costs on either the parties or on courts.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Entrepreneurial Spawning: Public Corporations and the Genesis of New Ventures, 1986-1999
By Paul A. Gompers, David S. Scharfstein, ...
-
Entrepreneurial Spawning: Public Corporations and the Genesis of New Ventures, 1986-1999
By Paul A. Gompers, David S. Scharfstein, ...
-
Entrepreneurship in Equilibrium
By Denis Gromb and David S. Scharfstein
-
Entrepreneurship in Equilibrium
By Denis Gromb and David S. Scharfstein
-
By Bruce Fallick, Charles A. Fleischman, ...
-
By Bruce Fallick, Charles A. Fleischman, ...
-
By Ariel Pakes and Shmuel Nitzan
-
Optimal Project Rejection and New Firm Start-Ups
By Bruno Cassiman and Masako Ueda