Interpretive Independence: The Irrelevance of Judicial Selection and Retention Methods to State Statutory Interpretation

47 Pages Posted: 12 Jul 2014 Last revised: 15 Sep 2021

See all articles by Amy Widman

Amy Widman

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School

Date Written: July 9, 2014

Abstract

Examining the relationship between the legislature and the judiciary in the statutory interpretation process on the state level illuminates a positive theory of common law courts’ independence. This article presents new empirical work that suggests a legislature’s attempt to codify the way in which a court interprets statutes has little influence over a judiciary’s sense of institutional independence. Moreover, neither the method of selection or retention of the judges, their term lengths, the method prescribed by statute, nor the type of claim being litigated correlates with the judiciary’s reception of the statutes codifying methods of interpretation. These findings have a few implications. First, the data shows judicial pushback to legislative interpretive directives at a fairly consistent rate regardless of selection and retention methods. In other words, all types of judicial selection and retention methods seem to share this type of institutional judicial independence. Second, while institutional ownership over interpretation appears unified across many variables like method of judicial selection, retention, term length, and type of claim; methodological choice in any given case is quite flexible, as shown by the trend of methodological disagreement in all states. Statutory interpretation is made up of both institutional and methodological components; institutionally the interpretive exercise appears firm, while methodologically it is flexible.

Suggested Citation

Widman, Amy, Interpretive Independence: The Irrelevance of Judicial Selection and Retention Methods to State Statutory Interpretation (July 9, 2014). NYU Annual Survey of American Law, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2464302 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2464302

Amy Widman (Contact Author)

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School ( email )

Newark, NJ

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
65
Abstract Views
648
Rank
635,785
PlumX Metrics