Liberalism and the Private Law of Property

1(2) Critical Analysis of Law, 2014, Forthcoming

20 Pages Posted: 13 Jul 2014

See all articles by Hanoch Dagan

Hanoch Dagan

Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law

Date Written: July 12, 2014

Abstract

This Essay reviews Alan Brudner’s neo-Hegelian theory of property. It critically analyzes Brudner’s conceptualization of the moral significance of property for private sovereignty, his understanding of the relationship between individual independence and self-determination, and his account of what makes private law private. I argue that Brudner is wrong on all three fronts and, furthermore, criticize his account of the market’s putative legitimation of property and public law’s alleged amelioration of the injustices entailed by a private law libertarian scheme.

Notwithstanding these failures, I salute Brudner’s ambitious and provocative project not only due to its many insights, but also because it helpfully elucidates the main strands of justification that property law must face. Indeed, a credible theory of property-for-self-determination must begin by remedying Brudner’s errors as per the moral significance of property for private sovereignty, the relationship between independence and self-determination, and the distinctive nature of private law. This Essay provides preliminary suggestions on all three fronts.

Suggested Citation

Dagan, Hanoch, Liberalism and the Private Law of Property (July 12, 2014). 1(2) Critical Analysis of Law, 2014, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2465383

Hanoch Dagan (Contact Author)

Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law ( email )

Ramat Aviv
Tel Aviv 69978, IL
Israel
+972 3 640 7302 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
171
Abstract Views
908
rank
173,935
PlumX Metrics