Advances in Austrian Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 1-19 (2015)
19 Pages Posted: 16 Jul 2014 Last revised: 28 Feb 2016
Date Written: March 15, 2014
We argue that the future of Austrian political economy rests on the study of how institutional entrepreneurs discover and implement alternative institutional arrangements conducive to economic growth. This requires a dual level of analysis in spontaneous order studies. How such institutional arrangements manifest themselves is ultimately an empirical question. As a progressive research program, Austrian political economy will entail cross-fertilization with other empirical branches of political economy that illustrate its own central theoretical contributions to political economy, namely economic calculation, entrepreneurship, and spontaneous order by having applied to the constitutional level of analysis. Accordingly, we argue that such cross-fertilization with the work of Ronald Coase and Elinor Ostrom will further expound the institutional counterpart of “rivalry” in the market process, namely polycentricism and its empirical manifestation. Understanding the distinct relationship between rivalry and polycentricism will provide the central theoretical underpinning of institutional evolution.
Keywords: Legal Institutions, James Buchanan, Ronald Coase, Elinor Ostrom, F.A Hayek, Austrian political economy
JEL Classification: K4, B3, B53, P51
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Boettke, Peter J. and Candela, Rosolino A., Rivalry, Polycentricism, and Institutional Evolution (March 15, 2014). Advances in Austrian Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 1-19 (2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2466822 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2466822