42 S.U.L. Rev. 79 (2014)
64 Pages Posted: 24 Jul 2014 Last revised: 24 Nov 2016
Date Written: February 7, 2015
The authors of the Fourteenth Amendment deliberately wrote that no state can deny the equal protection “of the laws” rather than “of its laws.” This may seem nowadays like a small difference, but it was important in that era, because it meant that the word “laws” includes both state and federal laws. Therefore Congress has a substantive role under this clause that applies against the states. This meaning undercuts U.S. Supreme Court cases like City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) which have largely shut Congress out. The emphasis here is on the original meaning of the Equal Protection Clause, and especially on the public understanding of its text when it was enacted. Had the Equal Protection Clause said “of its laws” rather than “of the laws” then the clause would have been directed only to application or enforcement of laws, rather than their content.
Keywords: Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, Equal Protection
JEL Classification: K00, K19, K39
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Hyman, Andrew, The Substantive Role of Congress Under the Equal Protection Clause (February 7, 2015). 42 S.U.L. Rev. 79 (2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2468984 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2468984