Anugraha Engineers & Contractors V. Union of India, 2014 (3) CTC 116: A Critique

Current Tamil Nadu Cases, Journal Section, Issue 3, 2014, pp. 133-138

6 Pages Posted: 23 Jul 2014

See all articles by Badrinath Srinivasan

Badrinath Srinivasan

Galgotias University - GALGOTIAS SCHOOL OF LAW

Date Written: January 20, 2014

Abstract

In Anugraha Engineers & Contractors v. Union of India, 2014 (3) CTC 116: 2014 (1) LW 132, a Single Judge of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras has decided that a Court under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter "1996 Act" or "Act") cannot assume the power of an Appellate Court and partially set aside or modify an Arbitral Award. This short paper critically analyses the said decision and argues that the Court has the power to modify or partially set aside an Award.

Keywords: Arbitration, Award, Partial Setting Aside, Modification, Challenge

JEL Classification: K41

Suggested Citation

Srinivasan, Badrinath, Anugraha Engineers & Contractors V. Union of India, 2014 (3) CTC 116: A Critique (January 20, 2014). Current Tamil Nadu Cases, Journal Section, Issue 3, 2014, pp. 133-138 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2469750

Badrinath Srinivasan (Contact Author)

Galgotias University - GALGOTIAS SCHOOL OF LAW ( email )

Delhi
India

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
196
Abstract Views
986
Rank
282,518
PlumX Metrics