Deadline Citizen Suits: An Idea Whose Time Has Expired

Appalachian Natural Resources Law Journal, Vol. 8, p. 51, 2013-2014

25 Pages Posted: 24 Jul 2014

See all articles by William Yeatman

William Yeatman

Cato Institute; Georgetown University, Law Center

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

Two statutory devices -- deadlines and agency-forcing suits -- were introduced in the Clean Air Act of 1970 in order to mitigate a perceived problem of agency capture and its corollary, nonparticipation by the public in the regulatory proceedings. Yet the Congress, for reasons inherent to the psychology of legislating, established too many deadlines. The paradoxical consequence of the Congress gorging on date-certain duties is that these two legislative mechanisms currently are achieving the opposite of what they were intended to do. Instead of warding off special interest capture, they've engendered capture by different special interests. And instead of eliciting participation, they've inhibited public input into EPA's setting of priorities. In order to alleviate these inimical impacts, this paper recommends certain judicial and legislative means.

Keywords: Clean Air Act, EPA, deadlines, citizen suits, regulatory capture, sue and settle

Suggested Citation

Yeatman, William, Deadline Citizen Suits: An Idea Whose Time Has Expired (2013). Appalachian Natural Resources Law Journal, Vol. 8, p. 51, 2013-2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2470127

William Yeatman (Contact Author)

Cato Institute ( email )

1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-5403
United States

Georgetown University, Law Center ( email )

Washington, DC
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
62
Abstract Views
1,004
rank
351,172
PlumX Metrics