Portfolio Choice and Longevity Risk in the Late Seventeenth Century. A Re-Examination of the First English Tontine

67 Pages Posted: 23 Jul 2014

See all articles by Moshe A. Milevsky

Moshe A. Milevsky

York University - Schulich School of Business

Date Written: June 26, 2014

Abstract

Tontines and life annuities both insure against longevity risk by guaranteeing (pension) income for life. The optimal choice between these two mortality-contingent claims depends on personal preferences for consumption and risk. And, while pure tontines are unavailable in the twenty-first century, the first longevity-contingent claim (and debt) issued by the English government in the late seventeenth century offered an option to select between the two. This paper analyzes financial and economic aspects of King William's 1693 tontine that have not received attention in the financial economic literature. In particular, I compare the stochastic present value (SPV) of the tontine vs. the life annuity and discuss characteristics of investors who selected one versus the other. Finally, I investigate whether the recorded 1693 tontine survival rates -- which are abnormally high relative to population mortality rates in the late 17th century -- should be attributed to anti-selection effects or perhaps to fraudulent behaviour. In sum, this paper is an empirical examination of annuitization decisions made by investors over three hundred years ago.

Keywords: annuities, pensions, mortality-contingent claims, financial revolution

JEL Classification: N23, G11, B16, H31

Suggested Citation

Milevsky, Moshe Arye, Portfolio Choice and Longevity Risk in the Late Seventeenth Century. A Re-Examination of the First English Tontine (June 26, 2014). Netspar Discussion Paper No. 06/2014-029, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2470454 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2470454

Moshe Arye Milevsky (Contact Author)

York University - Schulich School of Business ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
185
Abstract Views
1,316
rank
202,827
PlumX Metrics