Risk Management Transparency and Compensation

58 Pages Posted: 25 Jul 2014 Last revised: 19 May 2022

See all articles by Chang Mo Kang

Chang Mo Kang

Hanyang University - School of Business

Donghyun Kim

Chung-Ang University

Date Written: May 18, 2022


We examine the optimal design of managerial compensation in a setting where a manager must be induced to maximize shareholder value while managing the firm's cash flow risks. Our model shows that, while high-powered incentive pay (e.g., options) induces the manager to increase shareholder value, it also provides incentives to engage in unproductive risk-seeking activities. The trade-off suggests that shareholders' monitoring of risk management practices facilitates the awarding of high-powered managerial compensation. We empirically test this prediction using a regulatory shock, namely, the issuance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (FAS 133). The new standard enhances the stringency of hedge accounting treatments, thereby improving shareholders' monitoring of firms' speculative use of derivatives. We find that FAS 133 enhances the awarding of convex compensation to financial officers who manage and oversee corporate derivative programs. However, the new standard does not affect compensation for their peer executives. Our findings support the optimal contracting hypothesis.

Keywords: managerial compensation, risk management, corporate hedging, financial officers, FAS 133

JEL Classification: J33, M12, G34

Suggested Citation

Kang, Chang Mo and Kim, Donghyun, Risk Management Transparency and Compensation (May 18, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2470480 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2470480

Chang Mo Kang (Contact Author)

Hanyang University - School of Business ( email )

222, Wangsimni-ro

Donghyun Kim

Chung-Ang University ( email )

221 Heuksuk-dong
Seoul, 156-756
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics