Interstate Conflict and Cooperation in Criminal Cases: An American Perspective

European Criminal Law Review, 2014, Forthcoming

SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 141

52 Pages Posted: 30 Jul 2014 Last revised: 5 Nov 2014

See all articles by Jenia Iontcheva Turner

Jenia Iontcheva Turner

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law

Date Written: July 28, 2014

Abstract

Over the last decade, the European Union has adopted legislation that calls for the mutual recognition of arrest warrants, investigation orders, and penal judgments. These laws have aimed to strengthen the Union’s response to transnational crime, and EU policymakers are currently considering legislation to further harmonize the Union's law enforcement efforts. This Article compares these developments within the EU to the U.S. legal framework on mutual recognition in criminal matters. It examines the individual, state and systemic interests that U.S. state courts have considered in deciding whether to recognize other states' judgments, warrants, or investigative actions. These competing interests have produced relatively uniform rules on extradition, but much more diverse and fragmented laws concerning the gathering of evidence, the admissibility of evidence, and the recognition of foreign penal judgments.

The Article argues that three key factors explain the diversity of U.S. legal rules in many of these areas: 1) the tradition of federalism, which values local control over criminal matters; 2) the baseline harmonization of criminal procedures under the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees a high level of procedural fairness and strengthens mutual trust among states in criminal matters; and 3) the regular intervention by the U.S. federal government in investigations and prosecutions of cases with interstate elements, which reduces the pressure on states to devise a more uniform approach. The Article concludes by examining how these insights may be useful to ongoing debates within the European Union about the direction and scope of mutual recognition in criminal matters.

Keywords: criminal procedure, conflicts of law, extradition, recognition of penal judgments, admissibility of evidence, gathering of evidence, European Arrest Warrant, European Investigation Order, European Union criminal procedure, comparative criminal procedure

JEL Classification: K14, K42

Suggested Citation

Turner, Jenia Iontcheva, Interstate Conflict and Cooperation in Criminal Cases: An American Perspective (July 28, 2014). European Criminal Law Review, 2014, Forthcoming; SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 141. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2473248

Jenia Iontcheva Turner (Contact Author)

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
123
rank
224,932
Abstract Views
845
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information