Mass Probation: Toward a More Robust Theory of State Variation in Punishment

Punishment & Society Vol 19, Issue 1, 2017

Posted: 8 Aug 2014 Last revised: 26 Feb 2017

See all articles by Michelle S. Phelps

Michelle S. Phelps

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Dept of Sociology

Date Written: July 4, 2014

Abstract

Scholarship on the expansion of the U.S. carceral state has primarily focused on imprisonment rates. Yet the majority of adults under formal criminal justice control are on probation, an “alternative” form of supervision. This article develops the concept of mass probation and builds a typology of state control regimes that theorizes both the scale and type of punishment states employ. Drawing on Bureau of Justice Statistics data from 1980 and 2010, I analyze whether mass probation developed in the same places, affecting the same demographic groups and driven by the same criminal justice trends, as mass imprisonment. The results show that mass probation was a unique state development, expanding in unusual places like Minnesota and Washington. The conclusions argue for a reimagining of the causes and consequences of the carceral state to incorporate the expansion of probation.

Keywords: probation; penal theory; mass imprisonment

Suggested Citation

Phelps, Michelle S., Mass Probation: Toward a More Robust Theory of State Variation in Punishment (July 4, 2014). Punishment & Society Vol 19, Issue 1, 2017, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2476051 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2476051

Michelle S. Phelps (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Dept of Sociology ( email )

909 Soc Sci Bld
267 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
937
PlumX Metrics