Ex Post Incentives and IP in Garcia v. Google and Beyond

9 Pages Posted: 7 Aug 2014 Last revised: 8 Jun 2015

See all articles by Clark D. Asay

Clark D. Asay

Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School

Date Written: August 5, 2014

Abstract

In this Essay, I articulate a theory for why the outcome in the Ninth Circuit's recent Garcia v. Google copyright decision is wrong. I apply the same theory to explain the problem with patent assertion entities, more colloquially known as patent trolls.

Keywords: Copyright; patent trolls; intellectual property theory

Suggested Citation

Asay, Clark D., Ex Post Incentives and IP in Garcia v. Google and Beyond (August 5, 2014). 67 Stanford Law Review Online 37 (2014), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2476487

Clark D. Asay (Contact Author)

Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )

540 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
118
Abstract Views
1,018
Rank
375,551
PlumX Metrics