The Brady Colloquy

12 Pages Posted: 8 Aug 2014 Last revised: 4 Sep 2014

See all articles by Jason Kreag

Jason Kreag

University of Arizona Rogers College of Law

Date Written: September 2, 2014


Ensuring that prosecutors comply with their ethical and due process disclosure requirements has been a particularly vexing problem for the criminal justice system, particularly in light of the frequency of wrongful convictions caused by prosecutorial misconduct. The problem stems from the shortcomings of the Brady doctrine and institutional forces that make it difficult to hold prosecutors accountable when they commit misconduct. In response to these challenges, commentators have offered numerous reforms to increase compliance with prosecutors’ disclosure requirements; however, many of these proposals are complex, would impose considerable burdens on the system, and/or would require new legislation or regulations. Instead, this Essay calls for a short Brady colloquy during which a judge would question the prosecutor on the record about her disclosure obligations. Such a colloquy would provide judges an additional tool to enforce Brady, nudge prosecutors to comply with their disclosure obligations, and make it easier to punish prosecutors who commit misconduct. Most importantly, a Brady colloquy could be implemented by judges today without the need for additional legislation or ethical rules.

Keywords: Criminal Procedure, Brady, Prosecutorial Misconduct, Disclosure Requirements, Compliance, Wrongful Convictions

Suggested Citation

Kreag, Jason, The Brady Colloquy (September 2, 2014). 67 Stanford Law Review Online 47 (2014), Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 14-20, Available at SSRN:

Jason Kreag (Contact Author)

University of Arizona Rogers College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics