Achieving the American Bar Association's Pedagogy Mandate

Abstract

The ABA’s Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar adopted new law school accreditation standards in 2014. These standards articulate a pedagogy mandate that marks a “quantum shift” in our educational philosophy, moving our center from what is delivered to students to what students take away from their educational experience.

The pedagogy mandate is directly linked to preparing graduates to succeed, but its successful implementation remains an open question because of the traditional nature of the academy, its resistance to change, and the expertise required to implement such changes.

This article seeks to change the dynamic. It begins by putting the 2014 Standards into historical context and explaining their impact on legal education. The author then introduces a teaching effectiveness framework that was created by experts in education from the National Research Council of the National Academies and adapts it for use in legal education.

The legal community has relied on the NRC’s expertise for decades, in a wide range of fields, but the author believes this is the first time NRC expertise has been brought to bear in this context. The NRC is credited for its ability to bring the legal and scientific communities together and to make scientific theories accessible. In this way, the framework is a useful tool for law professors, especially those who are trained attorneys rather than certified educators, and improves the current state of our pedagogy scholarship by placing existing assessment and learning outcomes work in the broader context of modern learning theory and instructional design.

Keywords: learning outcomes, assessment, ABA Standards, teaching effectiveness