Accessing Justice in the Contemporary USA: Findings from the Community Needs and Services Study

17 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2014

See all articles by Rebecca L. Sandefur

Rebecca L. Sandefur

American Bar Foundation; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Sociology; University of Illinois College of Law

Date Written: August 8, 2014

Abstract

A new study of the civil justice experiences of the American public, the Community Needs and Services Study, finds widespread incidence of events and situations that have civil legal aspects, raise civil legal issues and are potentially actionable under civil law. Most are handled outside the context of the formal justice system. These events are common and can be severe in their impacts. People experiencing these situations typically do not receive assistance from lawyers or other formal third parties.

In 2013, two-thirds (66%) of a random sample of adults in a middle-sized American city reported experiencing at least one of 12 different categories of civil justice situations in the previous 18 months. For the whole sample, the average number of situations was 2.1; for people who reported situations, the average number reported was 3.3. The most commonly reported kinds of situations involved bread and butter issues with far-reaching impacts: problems with employment, money (finances, government benefits, debts), insurance, and housing. Poor people were more likely to report civil justice situations than were middle-income or high-income people. African Americans and Hispanics were more likely to report such situations than Whites.

People reported that almost half (47%) of the civil justice situations they experienced resulted in a significant negative consequence such as feelings of fear, a loss of income or confidence, damage to physical or mental health, or verbal or physical violence or threats of violence. Adverse impacts on health were the most common negative consequence, reported for 27% of situations.

Typically, people handled these situations on their own. For only about a fifth (22%) of situations did they seek assistance from a third party outside their immediate social network, such as a lawyer, social worker, police officer, city agency, religious leader or elected official. When people who did not seek any assistance from third parties outside their social circles were asked if cost was one barrier to doing so, they reported that concerns about cost were a factor in 17% of cases. A more important reason that people do not seek assistance with these situations, in particular assistance from lawyers or courts, is that they do not understand these situations to be legal.

Keywords: Access to Justice, Civil Justice

Suggested Citation

Sandefur, Rebecca L., Accessing Justice in the Contemporary USA: Findings from the Community Needs and Services Study (August 8, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2478040 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2478040

Rebecca L. Sandefur (Contact Author)

American Bar Foundation ( email )

750 N. Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
2173336100 (Phone)

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Sociology ( email )

702 South Wright Street
Urbana, IL 61801
United States

University of Illinois College of Law ( email )

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
275
rank
108,077
Abstract Views
1,264
PlumX Metrics