A Governance Gap in the Wake of Kiobel?: Possibilities for European Action

Posted: 13 Aug 2014

Date Written: December 1, 2014

Abstract

Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. has generated concerns that a governance gap will emerge for corporations that propagate human rights violations abroad. In Kiobel, the U.S. Supreme Court barred most “case[s] seeking relief for violations of the law of nations occurring outside the United States.” The U.S. had previously offered victims straightforward access to justice in its courts. As American courts grow less open to extraterritorial claims, recognition of the global context gains importance. The current climate presents opportunities for other judicial systems to step forward. Specifically, Kiobel has provided the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) with the occasion to interpret the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”) to require the right to an extraterritorial forum, and counterbalance the shift in the U.S. that Kiobel represents.

Suggested Citation

Kirshner, Jodie A., A Governance Gap in the Wake of Kiobel?: Possibilities for European Action (December 1, 2014). A Governance Gap in the Wake of Kiobel?: Possibilities for European Action, Harvard Int’l L. J. (Forthcoming)., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2478929

Jodie A. Kirshner (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge ( email )

Cambridge, CB3 0DS
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
240
PlumX Metrics