Why It's Better to Be Sorry than Safe: The Case for Apology Protection Legislation

(2013) 36 Dublin University Law Journal 127

30 Pages Posted: 15 Aug 2014

Date Written: June 12, 2013

Abstract

This essay evaluates the role of apology as a method of facilitating the resolution of civil disputes. It examines the importance of apology to society and the positive impact the communication of a genuine apology can have on the concerns and interests of individual litigants. Despite these advantages, apologies are chronically under-used as a means of resolving disputes, partly because of the fear that an apology might be construed as an admission of guilt on the part of the wrongdoer, thereby exposing him or her to liability. This essay identifies and examines the underlying reasons for the under-use of apology in these cases and analyses whether these concerns are real or exaggerated. This essay concludes by investigating whether the introduction of apology-protection legislation should be adopted in the Irish jurisdiction as the most appropriate method of encouraging the greater use of apology to resolve such disputes.

Keywords: apology, tort, alternative dispute resolution

JEL Classification: K13

Suggested Citation

Corbett, Val Joseph, Why It's Better to Be Sorry than Safe: The Case for Apology Protection Legislation (June 12, 2013). (2013) 36 Dublin University Law Journal 127, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2479393

Val Joseph Corbett (Contact Author)

LawSchool.ie ( email )

5 Lad Lane
Baggot Street
Dublin 2
Ireland

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
49
Abstract Views
378
PlumX Metrics